Hello, and welcome back to The Best & The Brightest, your daily dispatch on all things politics from the nation’s capital, brought to you by Tara Palmeri, Tina Nguyen, Peter Hamby, and yours truly. If you are not yet a subscriber, you can change that by clicking here. And if you like TBTB so much that you would like to give it to a friend, email email@example.com and tell them Julia sent you.
Also, before we start, I have a favor to ask. Puck just launched its first reader survey, with the hope of better understanding our community. It takes less than five minutes to fill out, and anyone who completes it will have a chance to win some free Puck merch, or receive an automatic upgrade to our Inner Circle tier of membership. You can find the survey here. Thanks in advance!
Can’t see the full story? You’re receiving the free version of The Best & The Brightest at . For full access to Puck, and to each of my colleagues, you can subscribe here with a special discount.
|From Moscow’s vantage point, it isn’t simply the gross incompetence of its military and intelligence services that prevented Russia from seizing Ukraine in a flashy blitzkrieg last February. It was the fact that Ukraine was armed with NATO weaponry, its troops trained by NATO advisors, its intelligence services constantly fed information by Western intel agencies. Moscow has made no secret of this frustration or its assertion that the battle for Ukraine was a proxy war against the West, itself. This is why, from the very beginning, Moscow has framed this war as one not between Russia and Ukraine, but rather one between Russia and what Vladimir Putin and his coterie love to call “the collective West.” And, according to this consensual ideology, it is this collective West—not the incompetence of any generals or advisors—that has thwarted Putin’s aims of...