A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR

Hospitals are here when you need us most – but hospitals across America are at risk of closure.

Among the many complicated factors that have neutered Democratic power in this country—the alienation of young men, the rightward drift of certain minority voters, the MAGAfication of the Big Tech class, etcetera—one is relatively quite simple: age. It was Joe Biden’s age that doomed his presidential campaign and arguably dragged down Kamala’s; it was R.B.G.’s death under a Republican president that created the conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court. The death of three House Democratic incumbents in office this year dramatically reduced the party’s leverage over the majority, temporarily expanding Republicans’ tiny margin.

Yet on the Hill, there remains a clutch of aging Democratic leaders who just won’t step aside, along with a fundraising apparatus that enables them and a social milieu that has traditionally treated the issue as taboo. Like many other political taboos, though, this one may be disintegrating under the pressures of 2025 America: A growing movement to oust aging members from the House Democratic caucus has become a near-obsession after the Biden debacle, and one of the most buzzed-about questions in the House Democratic world these days is which incumbents will face a serious primary.

It’s not just about anger at Biden. Democratic members, staffers, and consultants worry that if they only narrowly control the House next year, the death of elderly members could possibly flip the chamber back to Republicans during Donald Trump’s final two years in the White House. “It crosses my mind all of the time,” a Democratic former Hill staffer told me.

A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR

Hospitals need your help to stay. Protect 24/7 care—because when the doors close, it is too late.

Meanwhile, most elderly Dems have no intention of going anywhere voluntarily. After all, they’re the members who have committee and subcommittee gavels within their grasp should their party flip the House next year. When NOTUS polled all 50 members of Congress 75 or older who are up for reelection—the vast majority of whom are Democrats—about 70 percent said they intended to run again.

Assuming those House Democrats don’t change their mind and retire, a generational shift will have to come through primaries. But there’s a reason it’s so hard to beat incumbents: The caucus’s entire political apparatus is designed to protect them. Much of that energy is devoted to the frontliners, the vulnerable incumbents in competitive districts that hold the keys to the House majority. But more broadly, incumbents generally get the first pick of quality consultants, and they have access to unique fundraising streams. Often, they sit on multimillion-dollar cash-on-hand war chests built up over years.

Most notably, corporate PACs are attracted to older members, who often have track records of winning reelection and leadership slots on committees by dint of seniority. “Most PACs won’t give to challengers,” a Dem corporate PAC lobbyist told me. “It’s usually a corporate PAC policy.”

Then there are the cultural deterrents to primaries. Party leaders dread seeing millions spent on party infighting when Democrats are already struggling to keep up with Republicans’ fundraising. Colleagues could theoretically withhold donations from their own campaign accounts to aging colleagues, but in practice they rarely do so. There’s no more powerful force on Capitol Hill than political loyalty, and people are loath to deliver hard truths to mentors or colleagues who have had their backs in the past. People showing up for allies on their hardest days is what makes Capitol Hill run.

One former member, who has privately called for elderly incumbents to retire, conceded to me that they’ve already written a check to one nervous elder member and will probably write more. “They all helped me,” this person told me. “I will write a check, and hope at the same time they don’t win. We have to make room for the next generation.”

Younger challengers, meanwhile, find dead ends everywhere. Leadership and rank and file almost never donate or endorse against colleagues in primaries. (For all the terror that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has inspired in her colleagues over the years, she’s only actually endorsed against one of them.) Consultants get strong-armed out of working for challengers, knowing it could cost them big contracts down the road.

Despite those obstacles, most members still get primaried from time to time in their careers, which usually involves having to raise piles of money to fend off a snotty whippersnapper who eventually loses by a 60-point margin. One reason A.O.C.’s primary upset over Joe Crowley was major news was that it was exceptional; hers was one of only two successful House Democratic primary challenges that cycle. Most terms, two or three House Democrats lose reelection in a primary, at most. House challengers are still treated as black sheep in Democratic politics.

What’s different this year, however, is that they have more-skilled shepherds to guide them, along with a growing youthful fury that party elders just won’t step aside. The operatives and candidates involved know that defeating Democratic incumbents in primaries is nearly impossible; part of the mission at this stage is in fact to pressure certain members to retire through the threat of a difficult primary.

They’re also well aware that the old “challenge from the left” paradigm is so 2018. “The fight against Democratic incumbents right now isn’t ideological on the traditional left-vs.-center policy debates—it’s a fight between older leaders who believe the G.O.P. can still be reasoned with and that our institutions can still be preserved, and the new generation, which is clear-eyed about the G.O.P. and ready to reimagine what comes next,” said Amanda Litman, the C.E.O. of Run for Something. “It’s a multi-axis tension—fight vs. fold, transform vs. return. So for those who don’t retire, good luck.”

The anti-gerontocracy movement is getting its wish in some cases: Five elder House Dems have announced their retirements ahead of next cycle: Reps. Danny Davis, 84; Lloyd Doggett, 78; Dwight Evans, 71; Jerry Nadler, 78; and Jan Schakowsky, 81. “This decision has not been easy,” Nadler said in his retirement announcement. “But I know in my heart it is the right one and that it is the right time to pass the torch to a new generation.” Meanwhile, three Democratic incumbents are facing strong primary challengers: Reps. John Larson of Connecticut, 77; David Scott of Georgia, 80; and Brad Sherman of California, 70. Even more Democratic challengers are expected to announce early in October, and more still could announce deep into the spring as state candidate filing deadlines approach. The numbers aren’t huge in the context of the Democrats’ 213-member House caucus, but they’re enough to send a message.

There are also signs of cracks spreading in the still-formidable incumbent protection racket. Democrats pretty much unanimously tell me that donors are still furious about 2024 and anyone remotely associated with the Biden debacle—including members of Congress. I’m told there was even a nascent effort this summer to create a super PAC specifically to target incumbents; a senior Democratic strategist familiar with the plans told me it’s stalled out for now, but the very discussion of such a vehicle would have been unfathomable just a year ago, and it bespeaks the enduring discontent among the donor class.

The professional class, too, is showing signs of a shift. Party-sanctioned consultants still don’t go out of their way to target incumbents, one Democratic consultant told me, “but, yes, there’s a growing group of challengers worth considering”—and they’re more willing to take them on as clients than they would have been five years ago. To wit: Jake Rakov, who is challenging his former boss, California’s Rep. Sherman, worked with Putnam Partners, one of the top Democratic ad firms, to produce a viral video for his campaign. His candidacy has since created a permission structure for several other Democrats to challenge Sherman.

Indeed, the environment became almost too permissive; Rakov dropped out last week over concerns that the crowded field would split the anti-incumbent vote. “With so many Democrats now running in the 32nd District, the top-two primary math doesn’t add up anymore,” he said. “If all of the announced Democrats continue into the race, Congressman Sherman will face a Republican in the general election again, ensuring that he’ll remain in Congress in a safe Democratic district.” Point: incumbent.

Need help? Review our FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news.

You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with {{customer.email}}. To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.

Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10006