{{ 'now' | timezone: 'America/New_York' | date: '%b %d, %Y' }}
|
|
|
Hello, and welcome back to Line Sheet. Happy Prada Day to those who celebrate. It’s the only show where a
noticeable number of people arrive in head-to-toe looks designed by the house. (I’d never go that far, but I did pay a little homage this time by choosing a Raf Simons–era Jil Sander jacket.)
I’ll have my thoughts on the show, and more from Milan, in the near future. For today’s issue, accessible only to Inner Circle members, I’ve got an examination of LVMH’s new partnership with Global Fashion Agenda, some big-picture takeaways from yesterday’s Loro Piana
presentation, and a theory about Amazon, Saks, and Bergdorf Goodman.
For the main event, I’m taking a look at billionaire investor Amy Griffin’s portfolio following that doorstopper of a Times story questioning the accusations she made in her blockbuster memoir, The Tell. In some ways, this is the new
Massenet scandalette of the moment, although everyone involved is going to hate that comparison—a saga of a very wealthy, connected woman whose personal and professional life was largely intertwined, for better or worse. (By the way, did you hear Natalie and Erik settled?! A little more on that below.)
Programming note: Tomorrow on Fashion People, we’re releasing a conversation on the state of resale with The RealReal’s Kristen
Naiman, Marisa Meltzer, Erika Veurink, and Puck’s very own Sarah Shapiro, recorded live at WSA a few weeks back. Listen here and here.
Mentioned in this issue: Amy
Griffin, G9 Ventures, Goop, Gwyneth Paltrow, Oprah Winfrey, Meghan Markle, Reese Witherspoon, LVMH, Kering, Antoine Arnault, Amazon, Jeff Bezos, Saks Global, Bergdorf Goodman, Richard Baker, Armani, Loro Piana, and many more…
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
|
|
Four Things You
Should Know…
|
- And
just like that, it’s over: Today, Net-a-Porter founder Natalie Massenet and Frame co-founder Erik Torstensson announced that they have stopped suing each other, via an exclu with
Page Six. “The parties are pleased that all of the unfortunate litigation between them has been withdrawn,” a rep said. With that one sentence, they’ve
managed to temporarily stop the bleeding on their respective reputations and hopefully minimize any business consequences. It’s unlikely that Torstensson will be reinstalled at Frame. Massenet appears to have zero intention to leave her post at Imaginary Ventures anytime soon.
Obviously, all of this could have been better managed out of court and the media. But alas, that’s not what happened. At least this offers a bit of relief for two people, I believe in my heart of hearts, who truly
loved each other. Who knows what the future holds… - The woke side of LVMH: I was surprised by the announcement, earlier this week, that the French conglomerate was becoming a “strategic partner” of the Global Fashion Agenda, the Copenhagen-based nonprofit that “fosters industry collaboration on sustainability in fashion to accelerate impact.” Sure, Kering’s been working with the group since 2017, and Chanel came on board in 2024. But LVMH has generally
avoided engaging on a public level with these types of altruistic industry initiatives.
To wit, Antoine Arnault, who’s in charge of LVMH’s overall marketing and communications efforts, told Le Figaro in December 2023 that the group would not join the Fashion Pact, a pro-sustainability industry coalition originally launched by Kering’s François-Henri Pinault. He explained that LVMH was “not in the same business as these players in the textile
industry” and that the Fashion Pact “refers only to fashion,” which is “not representative of LVMH’s businesses, which also include hospitality, selective distribution, wines and spirits, and more.”
Perhaps Antoine still feels that way about the Fashion Pact, but there’s no denying LVMH’s alliance with Global Fashion Agenda is something of a statement, especially as most big groups—in America, in particular—are backing away from supporting broadly progressive policies. (This was the
leading topic of conversation when I attended the Global Fashion Agenda’s conference this past June.) Of course, in Europe, protecting the environment is not seen as woke, but simply common sense. - What about Amazon?: This week in Dry Powder, Puck’s private email about the finance world, Bill Cohan offered an explanation of the newish S&P rating for Saks Global, and gamed out the sale of the company’s stake in Bergdorf Goodman. But who, really, wants just a piece of Bergdorf Goodman? Saks Global chairman Richard Baker somehow always finds the money, although I suspect that, in this case, most strategic partners have no interest in engaging further with Saks.
There is, of course, one major exception: Amazon, which put money into the merger
in exchange for the launch of a Saks store on its platform. This week in Milan, fashion people openly wondered if Amazon could embed further, perhaps propelled by a thesis similar to that behind its Whole Foods acquisition—which gave the company access not only to new customers, but also new data. Buying half of Bergdorf Goodman would likely yield an even more rarified data set, given the way people spend at the store.
I reached out to a company rep to see if there was any validity to the
speculation. A rep for Amazon told me that the company does not comment on rumors or speculation. A rep for Saks Global said the same. And just in case you were wondering: No, Jeff Bezos is not going to buy Bergdorf Goodman for Lauren Sánchez, just like he wasn’t going to buy her Condé Nast, either. Yes, Sánchez is growing closer to the fashion industry, and I bet she will attend at least one of the major debuts in Paris next week. And I’m not saying she doesn’t
want something, but I believe we are overestimating the scope of their vision for her on this one. - Why buy Armani when you own Loro Piana?: There is still a chance that LVMH will bid on the 15 percent stake in Giorgio Armani that’s currently up for grabs, but I found it difficult to understand the rationale as I walked around
the near-silent Loro Piana presentation yesterday. Beyond the obvious and inherent value of the legendary 50-year-old brand, Loro Piana is already serving a similar ready-to-wear customer: a conservative dresser who appreciates both quality and quirk and doesn’t look at the price (or, rather, values it).
|
- Beyond
the enveloping knits, intentionally off colors, and dreamy prints, the shoes were once again the thing at this year’s show: I spied a velvet ballet flat and some square-toe mules that would polish off most looks, just as the bestselling almond-toe flat did before them. However, I was most impressed by the handbags—all nodding to their origins as containers of some kind. They are refined and a little prim without looking too uptight. For my money, Loro is the only luxury brand that has launched a
robust bag program successfully during the past decade.
|
Now, on to the main event…
|
|
|
The socialite turned venture capitalist is facing a reputational stress test after the
Times dissected the allegations at the heart of her memoir. Will she be cast out of the in-crowd right when the industry increasingly needs more risk-averse investors?
|
|
|
No matter what or who you believe, The New York Times’s investigation into
investor-billionaire-couture client Amy Griffin was pretty arresting. The reporting, which took three months, focused on Griffin’s account of rape by her former middle-school teacher as depicted in her 2025 memoir, The Tell—memories that she has said were uncovered while using MDMA.
But the piece also interrogated
her depiction of other people involved—including a former classmate, who claims to have been assaulted by a different teacher at the same school dance where Griffin alleges that she was victimized. Griffin declined to speak to the Times, but her lawyer Tom Clare told the paper that the reporters’ 11-page document, filled with questions for his client’s pre-publication responses, “has caused additional trauma and extreme physical and emotional harm to a survivor of
sexual assault, which is inexcusable.” (Clare, the namesake of the D.C.-area firm Clare Locke, is the go-to pit bull in these sorts of defamation and defamation-adjacent cases.)
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
|
|
There have been some whispers and speculation about Griffin ever since her book was published in March,
largely about the unusual MDMA element. (MDMA is really trending…) At the time, I processed most of this skepticism as simply the subconscious vitriol that many people feel toward uber-successful women—particularly genre-defining polymaths like Griffin. Like many socialites of her generation, she has ascended not by sitting front row at fashion shows or fronting a charity (though she does both), but rather by doing real(ish) work and operating with more than a modicum of self-awareness. She has
ostensibly hustled for most of her life, starting in marketing at Ms., Working Woman, and Sports Illustrated.
The heiress to a gas station and convenience store fortune, Griffin grew up rich in Amarillo, Texas, but her financial opportunities grew significantly after she married John Griffin, the hedge fund manager and founder of Blue Ridge Capital. In 2017, she started G9 Ventures, a V.C. firm, with money she made on her own off of
distributions from her family business. G9 has approximately 60 active investments and more than 20 exits, including Bumble, which went public in February 2021 at a $2.2 billion valuation. On, another minority investment, I.P.O.’d at $746 million, also in 2021. Griffin’s investments have also included Goop and Goop Kitchen, Rōz, K18, Spanx, Westman Atelier, Starface, Studs, and Oura. She also sits on the boards of Bumble, Gagosian Gallery, and Spanx.
Someone derided her investment
approach as “spray and pray” given her small check sizes, often below $500,000 (although they do get into the millions), but G9 undeniably offered Griffin access to a powerful network of likeminded women at the intersection of society, tech, Hollywood, and fashion. She wasn’t just a rich lady any longer. Now, she was a hybrid of C.Z. Guest and Kirsten Green, who had relationships with Gwyneth Paltrow, Reese Witherspoon,
Meghan Markle, and Oprah Winfrey. Her friends were invited to her readings at the Godmothers bookstore near Montecito and her female-founder-focused G9 summits, which took place in the Hamptons for a few summers in a row and attracted People magazine–level coverage. “When she summons the lady community out east, you wind up with everyone coming out there, because she’s in everything and could certainly do more,” one person who has dealt with Griffin
told me. I met Griffin in person at an event hosted by Bobbi Brown at Gloria Steinem’s apartment.
This past summer, however, there was no G9 summit. I’m told that Griffin felt her mission of convening female leaders was being undercut by the celebrity element, but she was also busy promoting the book, and perhaps bracing for the Times article to come out while online commentators picked apart her story. (A personal familiar with the operations
pushed back on that notion, and said that pausing the summit “was less about any one factor and more about wanting to take a step back and reflect on how to make the gathering as impactful as possible for their founders.”)
Will Griffin’s check mean so much now? As with Net-a-Porter founder Natalie Massenet’s recent public spat with her ex-partner Erik Torstensson, the fallout from a messy personal drama is often unpredictable—especially when there is real
money potentially on the line. Unlike Massenet, Griffin doesn’t have a co-founder or limited partners. And her checks are sufficiently de minimis that her portfolio companies can almost certainly shrug off any headline risks regarding association. They can also likely return the money if they need to.
|
|
|
But will she be ostracized from the investment community, the modern version of good society? It’s hard to
say. Griffin is a beloved character among her set, and one secret of the ultra-wealthy is that they’ve achieved their success through some form of ruthlessness. It’s usually a shared trait that makes media scandals seem like a rite of passage on the royal road to elitehood. The most common sentiment I heard in phone calls this morning was that she’s a good person, with good intentions. One newspaper story, in the increasingly popular eat-the-rich genre, may not change their feelings about her.
Indeed, one reality of the widening wealth gap in America is that the truly rich are usually safe from absolute judgment.
|
New on the Ssense beat: The Atallah family plans to bid on the beleaguered company they
founded in a sale process, according to a new report from Malique Morris. Also, they are planning layoffs. Should you buy anything from Ssense right now? Do what you will, but it feels like Russian roulette. [BoF]
No surprise that Larry Gagosian wears Jacques Marie Mage sunglasses, although I was
hoping for Maison Bonnet. [Wall Power]
I subscribed to the Substack run by 1 Granary, the independent journal for young people working (or hoping to work) in the fashion industry, so that I
could read their list of London-based businesses that are poorly reviewed on Glassdoor. Spoiler: The list includes basically every place you’d want to work if you lived in London and worked in fashion. The highlights have been shared widely on Instagram, but I’m not going to name names here. I rarely reference Glassdoor in my reporting because people who choose to air their grievances on the platform tend to be unreliable narrators, and while I’m sure there’s plenty of truth to their missives,
you need more than an untraceable paragraph of writing to prove it. (The internet really blows sometimes.) I appreciate 1 Granary’s desire to hold fashion employers accountable, but I wish there was more rigor in the way they approached this. Anyway, my big takeaway from their findings was that lots of folks are miserable. [1 Granary]
Would you rather have
dinner with Greta Gerwig or Kim Kardashian? Marina Abramović’s answer is better than yours. [YouTube]
LVMH is set to fully acquire the French business magazine Challenges, which it already holds a stake in.
[Fashion Network]
If you’re more of a play person than a musical person (most musicals are awful…), the tide is turning in your favor. [New York Times]
|
Until tomorrow, Lauren
P.S.: We use affiliate links because we are a business. We may make
a couple bucks off them.
|
|
|
Puck sports correspondent John Ourand and a rotating cast of industry insiders take you inside the executive suites and owners boxes where
the decisions that shape the entire sports business are made. You’ll hear interviews with players, network execs, and everyone in between. The Varsity is an extension of John’s private email for Puck by the same name. New episodes publish every Wednesday and Sunday.
|
|
|
Puck’s daily art market email, anchored by industry expert Marion Maneker, offers unparalleled access to the mega-auctions and galleries,
elite buyers and sellers, and the power players who run this opaque world. Wall Power also features Julie Brener Davich, a veteran of Christie’s and Sotheby’s, who provides unique insights into how the business really works.
|
|
|
Need help? Review our FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news. You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with {{customer.email}}. To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.
|
Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10006
|
|
|
|