• Join Puck

    Directly Supporting Authors

    A new economic model in which writers are also partners in the business.

    Personalized Subscriptions

    Customize your settings to receive the newsletters you want from the authors you follow.

    Stay in the Know

    Connect directly with Puck talent through email and exclusive events.

  • What is puck? Newsletters Authors Podcasts Events Gift Puck Careers

The A.I. “Personhood” Panic

A flurry of state-level bills are trying to ward off a future of A.I.-human marriages, A.I. C.E.O.s, and even A.I. landlords. It might sound silly, but the debate over theoretical “personhood” has myriad real-world implications.

Faces
Even if states pass their personhood bills into law, it’s not clear what impact they’d have—at least until we start seeing court cases where defense lawyers try to shift blame from a person to an A.I. system. Photo: Mario Wurzburger/Getty Images
Ian Krietzberg
February 19, 2026

Join Puck to listen to this article

In retrospect, it seems inevitable that the fierce philosophical debate around the “consciousness” of A.I. systems would bleed into politics, even if there’s zero evidence it’s real. In recent months, politicians across the country—who appear at least cursorily aware of the latest arguments—have taken these still-theoretical concerns and fused them into bills largely intended to keep A.I. models from, basically, living normal human lives.