{{ 'now' | timezone: 'America/New_York' | date: '%b %d, %Y' }}
|
|
|
Hi, and welcome back to Line Sheet. I’m taking over today with a final report from Paris—but don’t
worry, Rachel Strugatz will be back tomorrow. (And upgrade to the Inner Circle here to be sure not to miss her latest and greatest.)
My favorite moment this trip had to be when I clocked Condé Nast H.R. chief Stan Duncan at the bar at the Ritz, his favorite watering hole. (It’s definitely a great place to have discreet meetings with potential E.I.C. candidates.)
I will never know why Stan was at Couture Fashion Week while Chloe Malle, the editor of American Vogue, opted out. But I am sure he has his reasons!
In this edition, you’ll find the latest round of P.R. musical chairs, Lauren Sánchez’s new stylist (or simply great friend?), a brief word on the chaos of the anon Instagram accounts, and for the main event, a look at how the Couture shows reflected a We can never go back feeling that many
industry insiders are reckoning with at the moment.
Before we get started, I wanted to congratulate my close buddy, part-time manager, and Brigade Talent owner Max Stein on his New York magazine profile.
I thought that Charlotte Klein really got him right, except for calling him an “ex-hipster,” which is funny because he is so far from that in every way. (Heds and deks are actual weapons.) One anecdote Charlotte left out is that Max is obsessed with executive comp; at the end of every year, he posts lists of what top C.E.O.s are getting paid, with a note that says something like, “If they say they don’t have the budget, just send them this.” And that’s why we
are kindred spirits.
Mentioned in this issue: Jonathan Anderson, Dior, Matthieu Blazy, Chanel, LVMH, Schiaparelli, Daniel Roseberry, Alessandro Michele, Valentino, Silvana Armani, Lauren Sánchez Bezos, Jeff Bezos, Law Roach, Pietro d’Azzo, Francesca Nardi, Balenciaga,
Marisa Pucci, Moncler, Jenny Kim, Valentino, Emilie Leblanc, Celine, McQueen, Gaelle Collet, Alaïa, and… Ozempic-era dining.
|
Three Things You Should Know…
|
- Lauren
lays down the Law: How is it that Lauren Sánchez Bezos and Law Roach are only now finding each other? I forgot to mention yesterday that Couture’s star of the season was running around with Roach during the shows. Sánchez has been known to employ multiple stylists at a time, so perhaps she’s consulting Roach on Met Gala or Academy Awards looks in particular. (It’s not out of the question that she and Jeff
Bezos will attend the Oscars, even though films from Amazon MGM Studios received zero nominations this year.) Or perhaps Vogue is working on a piece about Sánchez attending her first Couture Week and Roach is styling her for it. (I’m just guessing. Who knows?! Roach didn’t respond to a request for comment, and neither did a rep for Lauren.) Anyway, they’re in cahoots, and I can’t think of a better match to make you all squirm.
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
|
|
- Attack
of the anonymous Instagram accounts: As you’ve surely seen, the blind-item accounts are proliferating. Of course, there’s Boring Not Com, the angry, half-outed, partial insider who delights those who revel in negativity and angers those who don’t. But others have emerged recently, including Fashionography, which offers a generally measured, if vague, critique of what’s happening inside
the industry. I occasionally admire Quiet Measures, which is mostly about menswear but sometimes offers analysis. The photographer Pietro d’Azzo is not anonymous, but he’s taking a similar approach. (He definitely stoked the Juergen Teller-is-overused fire I
wrote about earlier this week.)
Of course, the great thing about these accounts is that the anonymity affords their creators the opportunity to be brutally honest. (Remember, everyone is entitled to an opinion.) On the other hand, carelessness can create false narratives. Also, if you’re fast and loose with your faves (I definitely am), these accounts pose an additional risk. I have people sending me notes about who “liked” items slamming certain designers. Fashion is high
school, and Instagram is the cafeteria: Unless you duck out entirely to eat off campus, everyone is watching your every move. - Another round of P.R. musical chairs is upon us: There are many, many changes afoot on the P.R. and marketing teams at the luxury brands, mostly because the new designers are settled in and the successful ones are bringing in more of their own people. Let’s whip through them…
Longtime Pierpaolo
Piccioli collaborator Francesca Nardi started in a global comms role at Balenciaga this week. … U.S.-based Dior comms exec Marisa Pucci moved to Moncler and will effectively be replaced by the uber-professional Jenny Kim, who is exiting Bottega Veneta. (At least two new senior comms executives are slated to join Bottega in the next few months: one in Milan, and one replacing Kim
in New York.) … Valentino C.M.O. Yigit Turhan is leaving, but he’ll continue to consult at the Mayhoola group level. … Comms chief Emilie Leblanc is leaving Celine. … And of course, Valérie Leberichel recently left Gucci while Celine and McQueen comms exec Gaelle Collet is moving to Alaïa.
There are more that I am forgetting, I am sure. Remind me!
|
|
|
The fashion industry has reached an inflection point: Soft luxury simply isn’t selling like
it used to, and it’s unclear when it will regain momentum. How does this affect the high art of selling a $300,000 dress?
|
|
|
In the middle of Haute Couture Week, an infographic tracking luxury spending surfaced in my Instagram feed. The post, from boutique consulting firm Matter, noted that spending across numerous categories declined last year, including cars (down 4 percent), fine art (7 percent), personal luxury goods (2 percent), etcetera. None of that seemed crazy, given the downturn in sales of soft goods. What caught my eye, though, was the increase in luxury experiences: Ozempic-era
dining (up 7 percent), private jetting (11 percent), and even cruises (12 percent). Marketers have been threatening this change for a decade—the result of numerous, probably obvious factors, from the rise of the secondhand market to the fact that we need less in an increasingly virtual world. However, this fundamental change in how consumers operate seems to have finally settled in.
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
|
|
It’s possible to see this play out at the top of the industry. LVMH’s stock dipped 7 percent the day after
the company posted fourth-quarter earnings—not a sign of confidence that soft luxury is going to bounce back, even though it’s obviously not the end of the world for a conglomerate whose best-performing brands will continue to throw off billions. And yet, while fashion and leather goods will continue to sell, there’s a growing feeling that the pace at which the business accelerated over the past 20 years was unsustainable. We might be at the end of the consolidation cycle, which means
managing near-inevitable decline in the not-so-distant future. “It’s so over,” as one executive lamented to me this week.
I was thinking about this a lot during the Couture shows, which are the purest form of fashion. How could all this materialize on the runway? After all, couture serves two purposes: to market the dream of fashion, but also to sell actual clothes. This means couture needs to wow, but it also needs to be wearable, appealing to the clients who might
order these $300,000 pieces straight away.
|
From left: Couture looks from Dior, Chanel, Dior, and Chanel.
|
I could see designers wrestling with the often-incongruent demands of these collections, and none more so
than Jonathan Anderson at Dior and Matthieu Blazy at Chanel. Anderson, as I’ve noted, entered into the more difficult situation at Dior. He’s designing more, navigating more complex office politics, and working for the lesser house with fewer universally recognized brand codes. This was the best thing he’s delivered there to date: It managed to pack all of his ideas, alongside many significant notes from Dior’s history,
into one moment without it feeling overwhelming or confusing. And while I don’t think things are going to become easier for Anderson anytime soon, it showed that he does have the ability to actually make Dior… One Dior. It also photographed incredibly well, which made it easy for the internet to chew over.
Hopefully, it also helped crystallize Dior’s red carpet strategy, which has never been super clear but actually became even murkier upon Anderson’s arrival. (Many of these
dresses are Oscars-worthy.) I heard from those who attended shopping appointments that there was even more available to clients with less adventurous tastes: about 40 additional looks on top of the 60-plus shown on the runway. By Wednesday night, there were fewer than a dozen available left to purchase from the U.S. region’s allotment.
I could imagine someone wearing every one of Blazy’s pieces from his first Couture runway. But perhaps that worked against him when it came to the
marketing. As with his Métiers d’art show last month in a Manhattan subway, the soft lighting at Couture did not translate well to the web. And the subtleness of each piece, combined with the daywear emphasis—a reflection of the way we live now—threw many commenters off. I can understand why attendees have been screaming in their Stories about how great Chanel was in person; there was a sensitivity and mastery that you could only detect if you were there. (What was obvious online was
the greatness of the curvy, two-tone pumps; one friend messaged to say she dreamt about them. My understanding is that, in the past, shoes from the Couture show were never made. But I suspect we will be able to access some version of these in real life.)
|
|
|
When it comes down to it, couture is a proposal of what a brand should be—and how a client should
look. That manifests differently at smaller houses, where there are more constraints around what they can achieve, especially from a marketing perspective. At Schiaparelli, I was happy to see Daniel Roseberry’s strange couture delights in person for the first time. It feels mega being in that room. He is doing something particular, which a set of women love. Though I sometimes wonder what he is like as a designer when he strips away the surrealism that is so germane to the house, and also to his
own body of work.
|
From left: Couture looks from Armani, Julie de Libran, Valentino, and Schiaparelli.
|
At Julie de Libran, where the designer showed in her friend’s apartment, there was no doubt who would wear
the clothes: said friend. I was gone before Alessandro Michele’s Valentino show; the pictures looked hyper-nostalgic, but also flashy and fun, just like him.
Perhaps it was the team at Armani—where the late Giorgio Armani’s niece, Silvana Armani, took the final bow this season—who truly understood the couture assignment. Like Blazy, Silvana proposed plenty of trousers; nothing too fussy, just incredibly elegant, which is
exactly what Armani should be. Luxury might be going down, but we’re all going down with it.
|
What I’m Reading… and
Looking At…
|
Just a reminder that I broke the news about Sydney Sweeney’s lingerie line
more than six months ago (July 9). All the details were correct. The name is dumb. I do the work for you! [Syrn]
Mona Fastvold is directing the latest Miu Miu Women’s Tales movie, which will premiere at the Angelika in New York on
February 12. [WWD]
I told you… peptides! [N.Y. Mag]
Cutie and (seemingly) great boyfriend A$AP Rocky is on the cover of Esquire wearing
Chanel, styled by Matthew Henson. [Instagram]
Simon, the mall developer, is trying to terminate Saks Global’s leases at Woodbury Common (a Saks Off Fifth) and Stanford Shopping Center (the Neiman Marcus). [CoStar]
|
Until tomorrow, Lauren
P.S.: We use affiliate links because we are a business. We may make
a couple bucks off them.
|
|
|
Puck fashion correspondent Lauren Sherman and a rotating cast of industry insiders take you deep behind the scenes of this
multitrillion-dollar biz, from creative director switcheroos to M&A drama, D.T.C. downfalls, and magazine mishaps. Fashion People is an extension of Line Sheet, Lauren’s private email for Puck, where she tracks what’s happening beyond the press releases in fashion, beauty, and media. New episodes publish every Tuesday and Friday.
|
|
|
Puck’s daily art market email, anchored by industry expert Marion Maneker, offers unparalleled access to the mega-auctions and
galleries, elite buyers and sellers, and the power players who run this opaque world.
|
|
|
Need help? Review our
FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news.
You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with {{customer.email}}. To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.
|
Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St., New York, NY 10006
|
|
|
|